Should we read this as an objection to publishing a FPWD in the present form? On 3/8/22 09:55, Youenn Fablet wrote: > It seems desirable to improve the quality of the document a bit before > making it a FPWD. > > Several issues have been filed and seems to reach consensus (see > issues labelled as Ready for PR). > I would tend to go over them and update the document accordingly > before publishing it as FPWD > (https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-region/issues/22 and > https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-region/issues/21 in particular). > > There are also a few API shape issues that it would be good to decide > sooner rather than later, given Chrome is experimenting with this API. > I am thinking of: > - https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-region/issues/11 > - https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-region/issues/17 > - https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-region/issues/18 > > Thanks, > Y > >> On 28 Feb 2022, at 17:57, Bernard Aboba <Bernard.Aboba@microsoft.com> >> wrote: >> >> This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish a First Public Working >> Draft (FPWD) of "Region Capture". >> >> The document is available for inspection here: Region Capture >> (w3c.github.io) <https://w3c.github.io/mediacapture-region/> >> >> The github repo is here: w3c/mediacapture-region: >> http://w3c.github.io/mediacapture-region/ >> <https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-region/> >> >> In response, please state one of the following: >> >> * I support publishing a FPWD of the Region Capture specification. >> * I object to publishing a Region Capture FPWD, due to issues >> filed in open bug <#number> >> >> The CfC will end on March 14, 2022. >> >> Bernard >> >> For the Chairs >Received on Monday, 14 March 2022 16:09:24 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 14 March 2022 16:09:26 UTC