Re: Call for Consensus (CfC): Publish FPWD of "Region Capture"

Should we read this as an objection to publishing a FPWD in the present 
form?


On 3/8/22 09:55, Youenn Fablet wrote:
> It seems desirable to improve the quality of the document a bit before 
> making it a FPWD.
>
> Several issues have been filed and seems to reach consensus (see 
> issues labelled as Ready for PR).
> I would tend to go over them and update the document accordingly 
> before publishing it as FPWD 
> (https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-region/issues/22 and 
> https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-region/issues/21 in particular).
>
> There are also a few API shape issues that it would be good to decide 
> sooner rather than later, given Chrome is experimenting with this API.
> I am thinking of:
> - https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-region/issues/11
> - https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-region/issues/17
> - https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-region/issues/18
>
> Thanks,
> Y
>
>> On 28 Feb 2022, at 17:57, Bernard Aboba <Bernard.Aboba@microsoft.com> 
>> wrote:
>>
>> This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish a First Public Working 
>> Draft (FPWD) of "Region Capture".
>>
>> The document is available for inspection here: Region Capture 
>> (w3c.github.io) <https://w3c.github.io/mediacapture-region/>
>>
>> The github repo is here: w3c/mediacapture-region: 
>> http://w3c.github.io/mediacapture-region/ 
>> <https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-region/>
>>
>> In response, please state one of the following:
>>
>>   *   I support publishing a FPWD of the Region Capture specification.
>>   *   I object to publishing a Region Capture FPWD, due to issues 
>> filed in open bug <#number>
>>
>> The CfC will end on March 14, 2022.
>>
>> Bernard
>>
>> For the Chairs
>