Re: Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish Media Capture and Streams as (revised) Candidate Recommendation

Hi Carine, all,

I am not objecting to publication, getting feedback is always good.
That said, we are actively discussing on GitHub several issues.
It is unclear to me at this point whether resolving these issues will trigger substantive changes or not to the spec.
I would feel more comfortable if the WG would reach some form of consensus on these issues before going forward with the publication.
Hopefully, this should not delay it too much.

Thanks,
	Y

> On Jan 24, 2019, at 12:39 AM, Carine Bournez <carine@w3.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> This is a Call for Consensus to publish a revised Candidate Recommendation [1]
> of Media Capture and Streams, since the previous CR [2] is now rather behind
> the state of the Editors draft. [3] 
> This new publication will contain substantive changes.
> The 'exit criteria' for this CR will not change (i.e. demonstrate 
> implementation of each feature in at least two deployed browsers).
> 
> If you object to publication, please respond by February 5th.
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> [1] https://www.w3.org/2018/Process-20180201/#revised-cr
> [2] https://www.w3.org/TR/mediacapture-streams/
> [3] https://w3c.github.io/mediacapture-main/
> 
> -- 
> Carine Bournez /// W3C Europe
> 
>

Received on Friday, 25 January 2019 23:50:47 UTC