Re: DataChannels and Streams: Anything for TPAC?

While there is a discussion around and an issue for WHATWG streams for the
RTCQuicTransport (https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-quic/issues/2), is there
really that much interest for WHATWG streams for SCTP data channels?

I recall there being much more interest for service workers and SCTP data
channels.  If we're going to talk about SCTP data channels, it seems like
time would be better spent talking about service workers rather than WHATWG
streams.

That said, I don't know if anyone has updates for either topic.



On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 8:22 AM Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
wrote:

> In setting up the agenda for TPAC, and looking at what we talked about
> in Stockholm, we're missing one big item:
>
> In Stockholm, we had people express a strong desire to fit a
> Streams-based interface onto datachannels (both Stream-ing a single
> message and Stream-ing a datachannel; the latter might end up as a
> Stream of Streams....)
>
>
> We haven't seen any followup on this since then, so our current thought
> is that this won't be a TPAC agenda item.
>
> What do people think here?
>
> Harald, for the chairs
>
> --
> Surveillance is pervasive. Go Dark.
>
>
>