W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > November 2018

Re: Call for adoption - use case for "Trusted application, untrusted intermediary"

From: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 08:21:10 -0800
Message-ID: <CAOJ7v-1U8DG7YUYyC9q9562GXd-Ox4u+p7pA_XGuwOvFn2Srww@mail.gmail.com>
To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Cc: public-webrtc@w3.org
I support adoption of this new use case.

On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 1:00 AM Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>

> * From the Lyon summary of actions: “The WG adopts the E2E use case where
> we trust the application, but not the relay. (to be verified on the list)”
> The question is whether we should include in our “NV Scenarios” document
> the scenario currently described in
> https://w3c.github.io/webrtc-nv-use-cases/#securecommunications*
> <https://w3c.github.io/webrtc-nv-use-cases/#securecommunications*> - where
> the application (Web page) is fully trusted, but uses a relay service that
> should not be able to decode the transmitted media. The consensus in the
> meeting in Lyon was that this use case should be included; this call serves
> to verify that consensus on the list. Unless objections are raised and
> verified to be widely held in the discussion, the chairs will assume that
> the WG has consensus to include this use case. If you object to this
> document being adopted, please say so to the list before or on Wednesday,
> November 28. Harald, for the chairs *
Received on Thursday, 29 November 2018 16:21:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:18:45 UTC