Re: Call for adoption - WEBRTC-QUIC

• From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
• Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 10:33:04 +0100
• To: public-webrtc@w3.org
• Message-ID: <e680cb9c-20c3-ef21-3037-2cf4271af130@alvestrand.no>

Speaking with my personal hat on (which happens to align with my Google
hat at this point), I think this is the key sentence:

Den 29.11.2018 04:05, skrev Peter Thatcher:
> We don't need to wait for the QUIC WG to finish everything to start on
> API design, nor on getting implementation or developer feedback.  There
> is plenty that we needed to figure out in parallel, and plenty we still
> do while we wait for the QUIC WG to finish.  
> 
> We've been doing this already for a year, and we're ahead of where we
> would have been had we waited. 

The value of waiting is negative, not positive.

We need to align with the QUIC work at the finish line, not the starting
line.

Received on Thursday, 29 November 2018 09:33:31 UTC