W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > November 2018

Re: Call for adoption - WEBRTC-QUIC

From: Alexandre GOUAILLARD <agouaillard@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 08:18:58 -0800
Message-ID: <CAHgZEq66G7RPMvuEqimdX-fuYLAt-Ykk62ahohh1WPRTG0MuZA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Cc: "<public-webrtc@w3.org>" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
CoSMo software supports adoption.

On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 12:59 AM Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>

> * From the Lyon summary of decisions: "The WG will ask the list if we
> should adopt the WEBRTC-QUIC API document (in room: 2 opposed, ~10 in
> favor)" The question is whether we should adopt this document:
> https://w3c.github.io/webrtc-quic/ <https://w3c.github.io/webrtc-quic/> as
> a Working Group document Adoption as a WG document does not mean commitment
> to any specific part of the API, or any specific timeline for processing
> the document to CR and beyond, but does mean that we can issue the document
> as a first public working draft (FPWD) and ask for IPR declarations (if
> any). My personal read is that adoption as a WG document means that "we
> have consensus that there is a problem here that needs solving, the problem
> is within the scope of this WG, and this document is a start on the way to
> solving it". Non-adoption would indicate either that the problem shouldn't
> be solved, that the problem is out of scope for this WG, or that this
> document is so far away from the right solution that it's not a starting
> point the WG wants to consider. We are seeking both statements of support
> and statements of opposition. The chairs will tally the responses and
> attempt to draw a conclusion. Please state your opinion to the list on or
> before Wednesday, November 28. Harald, for the chairs *

Alex. Gouaillard, PhD, PhD, MBA
President - CoSMo Software Consulting, Singapore

Received on Tuesday, 20 November 2018 16:18:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:18:45 UTC