- From: Sherwin Sim <sherwinsim@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2018 16:11:21 -0500
- To: Sergio Garcia Murillo <sergio.garcia.murillo@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-webrtc@w3.org
Received on Monday, 5 March 2018 21:11:51 UTC
Yeah I have to agree here as well. I would like to think backwards compatibility of protocols would be something to keep in mind. In general thogh, I do like the idea of the JSON format. It does remind me a little bit of the term/cap stuff of H.245. Obviously not in a binary format ~Sherwin > On Mar 5, 2018, at 4:01 PM, Sergio Garcia Murillo <sergio.garcia.murillo@gmail.com> wrote: > > +1 I don't think that starting by changing the the media protocols is the best way of defining an api. > Let's define a low level modular api (that is what most devs want anyway) that could be reused in different scenarios (ICE+DTLS+ICE or quick) easily. > > Best regards > > Sergio
Received on Monday, 5 March 2018 21:11:51 UTC