W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > June 2018

Re: To Stream or not to Stream

From: Alexandre GOUAILLARD <agouaillard@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 14:56:08 +0200
Message-ID: <CAHgZEq4nvR0OEZJCBPOTnUFHDsYb+=o8JCAiotX2Fu1mTMXsnA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>
Cc: Göran Eriksson AP <goran.ap.eriksson@ericsson.com>, Bernard Aboba <Bernard.Aboba@microsoft.com>, youenn fablet <yfablet@apple.com>, Sergio Garcia Murillo <sergio.garcia.murillo@gmail.com>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
I ll be at the f2f, in transit in paris now.

On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 10:59 AM, Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>
wrote:

> Thanks for the info.  I'll add millicast.com as an example to the uses
> cases slides.
>
> Will you be at the f2f?  It would be nice to have someone that can speak
> in detail about this use case.
>
> Lastly, could you give a few requirements?   So far I have the following,
> but it seems incomplete:
>
> - Media protocol is easy to terminate on a server.  Ideally, allow app to
> control the wire format and transport to match existing server
> infrastructure
> - App has advanced control over retransmissions and FEC
> - App has advanced control over jitter buffer
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 6:48 AM Alexandre GOUAILLARD <
> agouaillard@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> if there is enough interest,
>> we (cosmo) can provide feedback during the meting about "millicast.com",
>> a webrtc-based platform for "live broadcast".
>> we did a state of the art of existing solutions, spoke with HLS authors
>> from Apple, limelight CDN, akamai, centurylong, venison digital (ex edge
>> cast CDN) and so on and so forth.
>>
>> two blog posts about webrtc in real-time streaming:
>> http://webrtcbydralex.com/index.php/2018/05/15/
>> streaming-protocols-and-ultra-low-latency-including-webrtc/
>> http://webrtcbydralex.com/index.php/2018/06/08/using-
>> webrtc-as-a-replacement-for-rtmp/
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 16, 2018 at 12:04 AM, Göran Eriksson AP <
>> goran.ap.eriksson@ericsson.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Den 2018-06-15 23:57 skrev "Bernard Aboba" <Bernard.Aboba@microsoft.com>
>>> följande:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>     "The place where convergence is more likely to be important is with
>>> live broadcasts since that's closer to needing "real-time"."
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> +1.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I just want to also mention the 1-way webrtc usages out there as well
>>> today, such as screen sharing but also Iot cases such as drones with
>>> cameras and surveillance systems.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Here the requirements on delay is not as stringent as person-to-person
>>> communication (often at least) and the added delay induced by a custom
>>> component may well be worthwhile given the added value that component
>>> provide. Here a QUIC based transport option in WebRTC.NV for upstreaming
>>> media would be nice to have.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Alex. Gouaillard, PhD, PhD, MBA
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------------
>> President - CoSMo Software Consulting, Singapore
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------------
>> sg.linkedin.com/agouaillard
>>
>>    -
>>
>>


-- 
Alex. Gouaillard, PhD, PhD, MBA
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
President - CoSMo Software Consulting, Singapore
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
sg.linkedin.com/agouaillard

   -
Received on Monday, 18 June 2018 12:56:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:18:42 UTC