Re: On the way to CR for webrtc-pc

I'm not sure if this is reasonable or not. the question is who has actually reviewed the current document start to end to make sure it all hangs together and also matches with the IETF documents. If we had a specific set of names of who had done that, I think it would be easier to decide.  Do you know who has review it ?




> On Apr 11, 2017, at 1:30 AM, Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> as announced [1] our ambition is to request the transition to CR during 
> this month. We received no negative feedback, so that is what we're 
> working towards.
> 
> We've made good progress on the open Issues, and think we will be able 
> to resolve them satisfactory before the end of the month. We're doodling 
> for one more Virtual Interim just in case we need a meeting to resolve 
> some issues (and it's early May so that would move us into next month) [2].
> 
> Since we in [1] asked everyone to file new Issues for everything they 
> wanted addressed before asking for transition to CR, and that is about a 
> month ago, we plan to label new Issues raised between now and the 
> transition request "to be dealt with after transition to CR has been 
> requested" or similar, and deal with them after the transition request 
> has been issued.
> 
> Let us know if you think any of this is unreasonable.
> 
> Stefan for the chairs.
> 
> 
> [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webrtc/2017Mar/0063.html
> [2] 
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webrtc/2017Apr/0025.html, 
> http://doodle.com/poll/ecs5efy9r5f9747e
>

Received on Monday, 1 May 2017 13:30:16 UTC