Den 29. okt. 2016 12:42, skrev Martin Thomson: > On 29 October 2016 at 07:47, Bernard Aboba <Bernard.Aboba@microsoft.com> wrote: >> Notifying individually about issue and PR filing makes sense to me. >> >> Not so sure that we need individual close and merge notifications, which (roughly) double the amount of traffic. >> >> Would it be possible to aggregate close/merge notifications? > > I think a better approach would be to mimic the config that the HTTP > working group does. There is a separate list for github > notifications. That can be very high volume. It helps with filtering > (don't subscribe!), and it meets the archival requirements fluffy > mentioned. You can even get a mailing list digest. We have this mailing list set up for mediacapture. It's called public-media-capture-logs@w3.org. There haven't been many subscribers. > > Personally, I find the github emails better. I subscribe to the level > that I care about for every repo that I'm interested in. On some > repos, that's just specific issues. The mailing list is much harder > to tailor to individual needs. >Received on Monday, 31 October 2016 14:17:31 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:18:20 UTC