- From: Varun Singh <varun@callstats.io>
- Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 11:11:31 -0700
- To: "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>
- Cc: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
HI Cullen, See inline. On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 9:59 AM, Cullen Jennings (fluffy) <fluffy@cisco.com> wrote: > > Any follow up on this… > > > On Mar 21, 2016, at 7:34 AM, Varun Singh <varun@callstats.io> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > At the last TPAC in Sapporo, we postponed discussing the following, they > > are: > > > > 1. Where to document the MTI metrics? > > > I think it should be documents in the W3C stats spec. It is a bit unclear on the exact split between webrtc-pc and webrtc-stats, so let me attempt to make a concrete proposal to remove the 8.6 Derived Stats Dictionaries from webrtc-pc. This would allow webrtc-stats to extend the RTCStatsTypes and the derived stats would all be in one place. > > > 2. Assuming we decide on an MTI list and a list of additional metrics. What > > would be the procedure to add metrics to any of those lists, or move them > > from additional metrics to MTI. > > > And more importantly, make sure that extensions stats developed in different > places don’t use the same name for different stats. > I suppose webrtc-stats can explicitly only say do not reuse the identifiers to mean something else. More concretely, AFAICT the IETF XRBLOCK WG decided to send their recommendations to this list and not create an IANA registry. Cheers, Varun -- http://www.callstats.io Analytics and Optimizations for WebRTC. We are hiring: www.callstats.io/jobs/
Received on Monday, 23 May 2016 18:12:20 UTC