- From: Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 13:04:22 +0000
- To: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Hi again, no objections (or comments) received, so the below is regarded as WG consensus. Stefan for the chairs On 02/06/16 10:48, Stefan Håkansson LK wrote: > All, > > below is a summary of what was decided at the meeting (minutes at [1]). > This is posted to the list to provide the opportunity for those not at > the meeting to object if there is something they find unreasonable. > > * receiver.track.stop() will not stop the transceiver, it will continue > to be alive and send RTCP (related to [2]) > * We will add an API control whether or not DTX is used (so the app can > decide to not use it even if DTX/CN is negotiated in the SDP O/A). > Exactly what the API will look like is still discussed ([3]). > * We will add a table summarizing RTCRtpEncodingParameters attributes as > proposed in [4] > * We will use both MIME type _and_ subType ([5]) > * We will not make addTransceiver/addTrack async, which means transport > can in some situations be null [6] > * Adding the same track several times via supplying it as argument to > addTransceiver() will stay allowed [7] > * We will not add (back) legacy methods like addStream or removeStream > [8] or related events. > > If we hear no objections within a week we will consider the above as WG > consensus. > > Stefan for the chairs > > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2016/05/27-webrtc-minutes.html > [2] https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc/pull/662 > [3] https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc/pull/675 > [4] https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc/pull/646 > [5] https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc/pull/648 > [6] https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc/pull/666 > [7] https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc/issues/583 > [8] https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc/issues/568 > >
Received on Friday, 10 June 2016 13:04:54 UTC