Re: Dropping SDP-specific errors

On 2/3/16 14:43, Daniel Burnett wrote:
> I'm probably reading this thread wrong, but it looks as if Martin says 
> the SDP error info is unnecessary, while Adam says Firefox does it 
> (and then some).  This does not appear to me as a consensus either 
> way.  Can either you (Martin) or Adam help me understand which is the 
> direction that would be best to go -- towards including line numbers 
> (or similar info) or away from it?

Martin and I are saying the same thing.

Headline: we don't need a special RTCSdpError object. The spec says to 
use the same error objects for SDP errors as we do for other errors, and 
that works fine.

Unimportant but maybe interesting detail that should have no real impact 
on the specification one way or another: Firefox squirrels away 
diagnostic information in this error object to help in debugging. It 
does this for all errors, not just SDP errors. In the case of SDP 
errors, this diagnostic information is usefully clear about where the 
error occurred and what caused it.

-- 
Adam Roach
Principal Platform Engineer
Office of the CTO