W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > September 2015

Re: DataChannels in Workers

From: Göran Eriksson AP <goran.ap.eriksson@ericsson.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 18:04:14 +0000
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Randell Jesup <randell-ietf@jesup.org>
CC: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <D22B58BC.1AF01%goran.ap.eriksson@ericsson.com>

>I think that this is a good idea.
>The primary change [Transferable] might be easy to do, but I think
>that we will want some security considerations.  Transferring a socket
>to another origin using postMessage() is a non-trivial thing to reason

>That said, I think that it's perfectly fine: an origin could easily
>accept the messages and forward them individually using postMessage().

Meaning we limit this to the SW’s from the origin initially and only later
to the foreign service worker capability that is being discussed in the
next version of SW?


Received on Friday, 25 September 2015 18:04:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:46 UTC