Re: DataChannels in Workers



>I think that this is a good idea.
>
>The primary change [Transferable] might be easy to do, but I think
>that we will want some security considerations.  Transferring a socket
>to another origin using postMessage() is a non-trivial thing to reason
>about.

>
>That said, I think that it's perfectly fine: an origin could easily
>accept the messages and forward them individually using postMessage().
>

Meaning we limit this to the SW’s from the origin initially and only later
to the foreign service worker capability that is being discussed in the
next version of SW?

>
>>
>>
>

Received on Friday, 25 September 2015 18:04:41 UTC