W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > September 2015

Re: DataChannels in Workers

From: Göran Eriksson AP <goran.ap.eriksson@ericsson.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 18:04:14 +0000
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Randell Jesup <randell-ietf@jesup.org>
CC: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <D22B58BC.1AF01%goran.ap.eriksson@ericsson.com>


>I think that this is a good idea.
>
>The primary change [Transferable] might be easy to do, but I think
>that we will want some security considerations.  Transferring a socket
>to another origin using postMessage() is a non-trivial thing to reason
>about.

>
>That said, I think that it's perfectly fine: an origin could easily
>accept the messages and forward them individually using postMessage().
>

Meaning we limit this to the SW’s from the origin initially and only later
to the foreign service worker capability that is being discussed in the
next version of SW?

>
>>
>>
>

Received on Friday, 25 September 2015 18:04:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:46 UTC