Re: RTCSessionDescription and RTCIceCandidate

On 09/10/2015 04:08 PM, Martin Thomson wrote:
> These interfaces serve no good purpose.  I propose that we remove them.
>
> https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc/pull/302
>
For RTCIceCandidate, I think one of Peter's PRs suggestd a bunch of new
fields for it (and we agreed, I think, that if we have both the string
form and the attribute form, all of the fields would have to be readonly).

But I may be misremembering.

Note (in case we adopt this): I think we can make the argument to
pc.addCandidate be "RTCIcecandidate or DOMString" for as long as we want
to preserve compatibility for. Doesn't have to be in the spec either.


-- 
Surveillance is pervasive. Go Dark.

Received on Monday, 14 September 2015 20:47:43 UTC