Re: Virtual Face to Face

At the Sept F2F it wasn’t terrible but there were some issues from what I recall

- microphone proximity, although that was resolved later
- a period where some echo started to happen. Went away after a while.

I think for more passive participants like myself it worked out well, 
but for more active participants or presenters I’m interested to hear their experiences and what worked and what didn't

~Sherwin


> On Nov 19, 2015, at 6:17 AM, Keith Griffin (kegriffi) <kegriffi@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> At the September session in Seattle I offered to look into getting access to the WebRTC version of Webex as it looks like an older version had been used previously. If any of the chairs or W3C folks want to follow up with me directly on that we can look at the possibilities.  
>  
> From: elagerway@gmail.com [mailto:elagerway@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Erik Lagerway
> Sent: 18 November 2015 07:42
> To: public-webrtc@w3.org
> Subject: Virtual Face to Face
>  
> The chairs are giving some thought to having a Virtual F2F sometime in January, where we would be using a online tool for video conferencing, screen sharing and the like.
>  
> The motivation here stems from rising costs in travel and growing interest from some members to try and at least attempt to have some of the meetings via Virtual F2F / Video conference.
>  
> The chairs would be interested in hearing feedback from our members with regards to timing, rough agenda and the concept in general.
>  
> Erik, for the chairs.
>  
> 
> Hookflash <http://hookflash.com/> | m 1.604.562.8647 | erik@hookflash.com <mailto:erik@hookflash.com> | @elagerway <http://twitter.com/elagerway>