- From: Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
- Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 20:28:05 +0000
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- CC: "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>, Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
On 29/05/15 18:17, Martin Thomson wrote: > On 29 May 2015 at 05:55, Stefan Håkansson LK > <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com> wrote: >> I think you are right, and it also seems (based on feedback from others) >> that replaceTrack should work even if a renegotiation is required. > > That's not what I got from Cullen's comment. His point was that > replacing should work from any state. Your statement here leads me to > infer that replaceTrack can cause renegotiation. That's what > addTrack/removeTrack are for. I did not get that from Cullen's comment either. I got that from Harald's [1], Ekr's [2] and Jan-Ivar's [3] (but I'm not sure I interpret this one correct) comments (it is also how Jan-Ivar's PR [4] is designed if IIUC). OTOH, Peter [5] and Jan-Ivar in another message [6] said that replaceTrack should never lead to renegotiation (but instead fail), so it is not really clear what is the preferred model. [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webrtc/2015May/0144.html [2] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webrtc/2015May/0140.html [3] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webrtc/2015May/0148.html [4] https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc/pull/195 [5] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webrtc/2015May/0123.html [6] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webrtc/2015May/0136.html >
Received on Friday, 29 May 2015 20:28:32 UTC