- From: Benjamin Schwartz <bemasc@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 10:38:50 -0400
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Cc: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 28 May 2015 14:39:20 UTC
Pull request is up: https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc/pull/233 On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Benjamin Schwartz <bemasc@google.com> wrote: > OK, I'm fine with that design too. I expect that the low water mark would > default to zero, and developers who want a tighter feedback loop can > increase the value. > > I suppose the next step would be for me to write up a pull request on > github. > > On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> On 19 May 2015 at 10:41, Benjamin Schwartz <bemasc@google.com> wrote: >> > So you imagine some mutable low water mark (e.g. >> > dataChannel.lowBufferLimit), plus an event that fires when >> bufferedAmount >> > decreases across this boundary? >> >> That would work. >> > >
Received on Thursday, 28 May 2015 14:39:20 UTC