W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > May 2015

Re: Data Channel Buffer Management Proposal

From: Benjamin Schwartz <bemasc@google.com>
Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 14:39:03 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHbrMsA7hfoYiuaTzGPkShqVyJ+VWaaB-4gJFQLcKDwDMCdOuA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Cc: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
OK, I'm fine with that design too.  I expect that the low water mark would
default to zero, and developers who want a tighter feedback loop can
increase the value.

I suppose the next step would be for me to write up a pull request on
github.

On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On 19 May 2015 at 10:41, Benjamin Schwartz <bemasc@google.com> wrote:
> > So you imagine some mutable low water mark (e.g.
> > dataChannel.lowBufferLimit), plus an event that fires when bufferedAmount
> > decreases across this boundary?
>
> That would work.
>
Received on Friday, 22 May 2015 18:39:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:44 UTC