OK, I'm fine with that design too. I expect that the low water mark would default to zero, and developers who want a tighter feedback loop can increase the value. I suppose the next step would be for me to write up a pull request on github. On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote: > On 19 May 2015 at 10:41, Benjamin Schwartz <bemasc@google.com> wrote: > > So you imagine some mutable low water mark (e.g. > > dataChannel.lowBufferLimit), plus an event that fires when bufferedAmount > > decreases across this boundary? > > That would work. >Received on Friday, 22 May 2015 18:39:30 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:18:06 UTC