Re: Data Channel Buffer Management Proposal

OK, I'm fine with that design too.  I expect that the low water mark would
default to zero, and developers who want a tighter feedback loop can
increase the value.

I suppose the next step would be for me to write up a pull request on

On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Martin Thomson <>

> On 19 May 2015 at 10:41, Benjamin Schwartz <> wrote:
> > So you imagine some mutable low water mark (e.g.
> > dataChannel.lowBufferLimit), plus an event that fires when bufferedAmount
> > decreases across this boundary?
> That would work.

Received on Friday, 22 May 2015 18:39:30 UTC