Re: Data Channel Buffer Management Proposal

OK, I'm fine with that design too.  I expect that the low water mark would
default to zero, and developers who want a tighter feedback loop can
increase the value.

I suppose the next step would be for me to write up a pull request on
github.

On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On 19 May 2015 at 10:41, Benjamin Schwartz <bemasc@google.com> wrote:
> > So you imagine some mutable low water mark (e.g.
> > dataChannel.lowBufferLimit), plus an event that fires when bufferedAmount
> > decreases across this boundary?
>
> That would work.
>