- From: Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 15:09:55 -0700
- To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
- Cc: Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAJrXDUEG6dZh3H1Z0hEceVwiduU6FC=q7Fg7LJWDcd-MNNGFXQ@mail.gmail.com>
Thank you for the example. I don't view that as "needs renegotiation" as much as "the RtpSender was configured to send in a codec it's not capable of sending". Once we, someday, have direct control of RtpSenders (sans SDP), the browser would basically view this as "JS told me to do something I can't do". And if you view SetLocalDescription/SetRemoteDescription as a very poor API for controlling RtpSenders (which, in reality, it is), then this is also a case of "JS told me to do something I can't". And all the browser can do is either throw an exception or send nothing. Thus, I think we can make a general rule of "If the application configures the RtpSender to do something impossible it either throws an exception or sends nothing". On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 11:51 AM, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> wrote: > On 5/22/15 09:56, Stefan Håkansson LK wrote: > >> On 22/05/15 16:15, Peter Thatcher wrote: >> [...] >> >>> * Detection/reporting of that negotiation would be needed: as said >>> above, there seem to be consensus of that if the new track >>> (provided by >>> replaceTrack) would require a re-negotiation, replaceTrack should >>> fail. >>> How quickly can this be detected? How should it be reported back to >>> the >>> application? >>> >>> >>> I don't recall of the top of my head any situation in which >>> replaceTrack could trigger a renegotiation. Perhaps if we had some >>> scenarios were we thought that might come up, we could know how long it >>> would take to detect. Does anyone have any concrete examples? >>> >> I agree, some concrete examples here would be helpful. >> >> > Here's the easy example: I've started a session with a stream comes from a > USB camera with an on-chip H.265 encoder, so the codecs I've indicated in > my offer include H.265. The answer only indicated H.265 for this stream. > > I have another stream, from a different source, which I cannot encode to > H.265 real-time. I call replaceTrack to swap this stream in for the H.265 > stream. Unless we renegotiate the media line, this isn't going to work. > > /a >
Received on Friday, 22 May 2015 22:11:03 UTC