I don't understand what process you want the editors to follow. Perhaps bullet points or a list would help and then we can discuss wordsmithing. On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org> wrote: > On 20/05/2015 23:25, Eric Rescorla wrote: > >> Editors are responsible for reflecting the consensus from the >> Working Group in the specifications; where editors bring >> technical >> solutions in the specifications that have not been reviewed >> by the >> group, these solutions are annotated to reflect their status. >> >> >> I don't really understand the clause after the semicolon. Can >> you expand >> on what this >> is intended to mean? >> >> >> Some groups operate under a work mode where editors are defining >> specs on their own, and unless someone complains, the stuff is >> assumed to have consensus. This works well in cases where the >> complexity or the stakes around a given spec aren't very high. The >> intent here is to make it clear that the WebRTC WG is not operating >> under such a mode. >> >> >> OK, well, I certainly didn't get that. Perhaps a rewrite is in order. >> > > I would be happy to propose a rewrite, but I'm not sure I understand yet > what it is that was either misleading or unclear in my initial text > (English is obviously not my first language). Could you either suggest some > text or give more details as to what is confusing in the current text? > > Thanks, > > Dom > >
Received on Wednesday, 20 May 2015 22:06:54 UTC