W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > May 2015

Re: Charter task force - list of volunteers

From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 15:05:45 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBOynnuUTJzW1A8MAuUFVAbFHMNTFHEJqdnC3r6GYArvVA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
Cc: Erik Lagerway <erik@hookflash.com>, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>, "Michael Champion (MS OPEN TECH)" <Michael.Champion@microsoft.com>
I don't understand what process you want the editors to follow. Perhaps
bullet
points or a list would help and then we can discuss wordsmithing.

On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
wrote:

> On 20/05/2015 23:25, Eric Rescorla wrote:
>
>>              Editors are responsible for reflecting the consensus from the
>>              Working Group in the specifications; where editors bring
>>         technical
>>              solutions in the specifications that have not been reviewed
>>         by the
>>              group, these solutions are annotated to reflect their status.
>>
>>
>>         I don't really understand the clause after the semicolon. Can
>>         you expand
>>         on what this
>>         is intended to mean?
>>
>>
>>     Some groups operate under a work mode where editors are defining
>>     specs on their own, and unless someone complains, the stuff is
>>     assumed to have consensus. This works well in cases where the
>>     complexity or the stakes around a given spec aren't very high. The
>>     intent here is to make it clear that the WebRTC WG is not operating
>>     under such a mode.
>>
>>
>> OK, well, I certainly didn't get that. Perhaps a rewrite is in order.
>>
>
> I would be happy to propose a rewrite, but I'm not sure I understand yet
> what it is that was either misleading or unclear in my initial text
> (English is obviously not my first language). Could you either suggest some
> text or give more details as to what is confusing in the current text?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dom
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 20 May 2015 22:06:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:44 UTC