W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > March 2015

Re: Should pc.getRemoteStreams() include all remote tracks after pcsetRemoteDescription() ?

From: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2015 17:07:56 -0800
Message-ID: <CAOJ7v-3k4qmusNyyZPJAZsdwcdWDhHcX=Edu9Fzv0R9v9EGbtA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Cc: Jan-Ivar Bruaroey <jib@mozilla.com>, IƱaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>, Byron Campen <docfaraday@gmail.com>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
The unearthing of various things like this (e.g. onnegotiationneeded) make
me think we ought to have some sort of bug bash where we just go through
and fix all the places in the spec where text no longer matches reality.

On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 9:39 AM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>

> On 5 March 2015 at 07:01, Jan-Ivar Bruaroey <jib@mozilla.com> wrote:
> > How does one reject? I've heard talk about calling track.stop() on the
> > remote track but couldn't find that in the spec.
> This is based on a proposal that Adam floated something like 2 years
> ago.  It got pretty good feedback, and most of the discussion over
> that period has sort of assumed that was the way things were.  Like
> this issue however, no effort has been put in to actually change the
> spec.
Received on Friday, 6 March 2015 01:08:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:43 UTC