- From: Jan-Ivar Bruaroey <jib@mozilla.com>
- Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2015 20:54:24 -0400
- To: Randell Jesup <randell-ietf@jesup.org>, public-webrtc@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 2 June 2015 00:54:55 UTC
On 6/1/15 2:35 AM, Randell Jesup wrote: > On 5/30/2015 12:51 AM, Jan-Ivar Bruaroey wrote: >> Make sure you see both fiddles at once and press |ReplaceTrack| vs >> |Remove+Add| to compare. >> >> It impressed me how small the difference was - granted my machines >> are same-LAN (need to find another wifi, my wifi-4G test failed) - I >> see a split-second flicker on |Remove+Add| compared to |ReplaceTrack| >> which is super-smooth (though there's sometimes a delay flipping >> back, a bug?) Test is also not glare-proofed. > > To do a more real-world test: add a setTimeout() for say 50, 100 or > 200ms to delay each send() in the renegotiation to see the impacts > based on RTT. Even at 50ms it should be perceivable (since you get at > least 2x the delay, plus overhead). Also make sure your camera isn't > running at 5 or 10fps in a dark room. :-) In http://jsfiddle.net/7vxzbybp set: |var additionalSignalingDelayMs = 200; ||(|Don't forget to hit "Run" so you're running what you've changed). I don't understand why this is unacceptable for a codec corner-case. .: Jan-Ivar :.
Received on Tuesday, 2 June 2015 00:54:55 UTC