Good idea. Something like that is useful. And I think some W3C WG(s) may have an interest/responsibility also in improving on this. Regards Göran > > >On 31/07/15 20:28, Roman Shpount wrote: >> I actually appreciate the seriousness of the issue. > >I'm wondering if there's anything we could (get someone to) >do so that issues like this get handled better in future? > >For example I'm wondering if a description of the various >ways in which current VPN services operate and some of the >consequences when things go wrong might be useful input to >WGs faced with similar issues. > >I've no idea if someone would be motivated to write that >up, nor for how long such text would be useful but I suspect >there's a document there that'd be good to have. (Or if >there's a non-RFC that has a good survey/description then >a pointer to that would be good.) > >Anyway, I'd be happy to help someone who was willing and >able to try that with any process stuff. > >Cheers, >S. > >_______________________________________________ >rtcweb mailing list >rtcweb@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcwebReceived on Friday, 31 July 2015 20:21:42 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:18:08 UTC