Chia-Hung,
I do not support adding this item to the work of the WebRTC WG. The WG
has an enormous amount to do already and this is largely orthogonal to the
major thrust of our efforts, which is to enable real-time applications
(e.g.,
video conferencing.)
It's a particularly bad idea to form a task force for this. While perhaps
necessary at the time for the specific case of getUserMedia, it has been
a real hassle to have fragmented discussion of WebRTC-related topics.
If you want to pursue standardization of this technology, you should form
a separate W3C WG. You might also consider taking it to the
Timed Media WG.
-Ekr
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Chia-Hung Tai <ctai@mozilla.com> wrote:
> Hi, Chairs, Dom and all,
>
> This is Chia-hung Tai from Mozilla. I would like to add a new working
> items, "MediaStream with worker"[1] into WebRTC WG and form a new task
> force for this specification. This working item is based on a project
> called FoxEye[2]. You can check the use cases in [3].
>
> This specification extends the Media Capture and Streams specification to
> allow JavaScript developers to process video frame data in workers on the
> web applications.
>
> I already implement a prototype based on the spec[1]. And get positive
> feedbacks from Mozilla DOM peers. I think it should be standardized. You
> can see the demo in [4]. Looking forward to hear your voices. Thanks
>
> [1]: http://chiahungtai.github.io/mediacapture-worker/
> [2]: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Project_FoxEye
> [3]: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Project_FoxEye#Use_Cases
> [4]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=prybkXsTGXY
>
> BR,
> CTai
>