On 01/22/2015 08:20 PM, Jan-Ivar Bruaroey wrote: > On 1/20/15 11:42 AM, Harald Alvestrand wrote: >> There's also an issue with the fact that enums don't support partial, >> the way interfaces do, so according to WebIDL formality, we're stuck >> with having to define them once. >> >> We may be better off with strings here; in Javascript, they're >> strings anyway, so might as well admit it in the WebIDL API too. > > Turns out there's a bug on partial enums, so I've raised this question > with a reference to the bug [1]. > > [1] > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-script-coord/2015JanMar/0057.html > > .: Jan-Ivar :. > > I don't want to depend on webIDL features that might or might not happen; I'm fine with converting to DOMString now and leaving a note (in the bugtracker?) that we should consider moving back to enum once bug xxxx is resolved in a way we find useful.Received on Friday, 23 January 2015 10:37:35 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:42 UTC