> On Jan 19, 2015, at 5:25 AM, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote: > > I now realize that I had messed up the process in my head. > > It's WD -> CR -> PR -> Rec, so CR is (I think) the earliest time that can possibly be taken as "stable" - so Cullen's suggestion would be no later than (and might be earlier than) the "stable enough" that I was suggesting. > > I'm fine with Cullen's text, then. I could be convinced with other things too. I just want it to be a specific well defined point not something that is super vague.Received on Monday, 9 February 2015 22:29:13 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:18:04 UTC