- From: Adam Bergkvist <adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com>
- Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 14:26:35 +0000
- To: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Hi With the introduction of RTCRtpSender/Receiver (Doohickeys), the way to send and receive media will change. We used to add a MediaStream at one end, and dispatch a corresponding stream at the other end. The new addTrack()-based approach is to add one MediaStreamTrack and zero or more MediaStreams, containing the track, at one end, and dispatch a RTCRtpReceiver, the corresponding track and a list of MediaStreams, containting the track, at the other end. This implies creating a new stream if a certain stream isn't represented at the other side, or no stream was supplied for a track, and keeping handles to previously created streams to be able to add future tracks to them. Even though the API call is named addTrack(), MediaStreams are very much involved with increased complexity as the cost. One reason for this is the need to polyfill the old addStream()-API on top of the new. A different approach could be to keep the new addTrack()-API simple and provide the API points needed to polyfill or implement advanced stream handling in the application. For example: addTrack(MST track, optional DOMString tag); - The optional tag argument is a string that is signalled in SDP that contains application specific info. For example, a list of MediaStream ids. The corresponding event would expose the string the other side. (Constructor) MediaStream(DOMString id); - Construct a stream with a given id. Feedback and suggestions are welcome. /Adam
Received on Monday, 9 February 2015 14:27:05 UTC