W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > August 2015

Re: Al PR for adding various fields to RtpParameters and RtpEncodingParameters

From: Randell Jesup <randell-ietf@jesup.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 21:34:31 -0400
To: public-webrtc@w3.org
Message-ID: <55DD17A7.2020909@jesup.org>
On 8/24/2015 6:01 PM, Peter Thatcher wrote:
> maxFramerate can be accomplished with a gUM constraint, so I don't 
> think it's needed on the RtpSender.

Not all sources come from gUM (video.captureStream() for example, or 
canvas.captureStream(), or even another PeerConnection, etc).  Also, a 
stream may have more than one consumer with different needs.  (On a side 
note, I was surprised looking at some stats that show a non-trivial 
number of peerconnections are carrying 60fps video.)

>
> Also, I should mention that I didn't include "minQuality" from ORTC, 
> since I didn't think we'd ever be able to resolve what "quality" means 
> in the 1.0 timeframe, even if it's relative quality.

:-)  I had the same thought...

-- 
Randell Jesup -- rjesup a t mozilla d o t com
Please please please don't email randell-ietf@jesup.org!  Way too much spam
Received on Wednesday, 26 August 2015 01:36:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:45 UTC