W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > April 2015

Re: ReplaceTrack and track.id (Re: ReplaceTrack - need to evaluate alternatives)

From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 10:38:50 +0200
Message-ID: <5530C69A.2000409@alvestrand.no>
To: public-webrtc@w3.org
On 04/17/2015 07:46 AM, Jan-Ivar Bruaroey wrote:
> On 4/15/15 3:37 AM, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
>> On 04/15/2015 08:07 AM, Jan-Ivar Bruaroey wrote:
>>> On 4/14/15 2:19 PM, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
>>>> - B updates the ID of the track when signalling happens. A has to 
>>>> remember that it must use X when talking about the track before 
>>>> signalling, and Y afterwards. (I think this is what Jan-Ivar's pull 
>>>> requests state now).
>>>
>>> Why must A remember to use X when talking about the track before 
>>> signaling? Why not Y?
>>>
>>> .: Jan-Ivar :.
>>>
>>>
>> Because before signalling happens, B has never seen Y, and has no 
>> idea what Y maps to.
>
> Does this assume A and B are talking through means other than 
> signaling? I can't see how this is a problem otherwise.

Sorry, sloppy language. I was using "signaling" when I should have been 
saying "negotiation".
It's before and after doing the offer/answer exchange that is the 
critical point.


>
> .: Jan-Ivar :.
>
>
Received on Friday, 17 April 2015 08:39:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:43 UTC