W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > April 2015

Re: ReplaceTrack vs RTPSender.track = new

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 09:52:01 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnWNK1gYQr4Q-KLS7HRH4PF0Xz2JyvWaV2ox916V67tHrQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Cc: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
On 15 April 2015 at 00:31, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote:
> If ReplaceTrack can sometimes fail, and we don't want exceptions to be
> thrown (for instance, we might not be able to instantly decide whether the
> replacement is possible or not), ReplaceTrack() is superior.

Thank you for explaining my point much more clearly than I ever could.
This is the conclusion I had reached.
Received on Wednesday, 15 April 2015 16:52:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:43 UTC