Re: CfC to transition "Media Capture and Streams" to Last Call

+1 once notes are cleaned up :).

On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 11:11 AM, Stefan Håkansson LK <
stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com> wrote:

> After long and hard work by the MediaCapture TF we're now in the
> situation that we have a new Editor's draft [1] and *no* open Pull
> Requests or Issues (except for a couple labeled "After Last Call") [2].
>
> We think this is the right time to move to Last Call. LC does not mean
> that every detail is frozen and settled, but it is a signal that the
> group thinks that the document is ready for wider review and that it
> satisfies relevant technical requirements [3].
>
> In particular, as the task force has already gone through several
> pre-last call reviews of the document, we expect that interested parties
> in the group have already had the opportunity to review the document and
> concerns that would be raised (if any) would be limited to recent
> changes brought to the document as part of our efforts in closing issues.
>
> There is one outstanding question, namely the requirement on the API
> to provide a mechanism for the requesting application to indicate if it
> requests a long term or one-time permission to use input devices [4].
> However, [4] is a document developed by the IETF rtcweb WG which will
> discuss if this requirement can be removed. If the outcome is that it
> cannot be removed, that input can be given during the LC period.
>
> Due to to ongoing IETF meeting and the upcoming holidays we will let
> this CfC run until end of *April 10th 2015*. Explicit responses to this
> CfC are preferred, silence will be interpreted as being in agreement.
>
> Harald and Stefan
>
> [1]
> http://w3c.github.io/mediacapture-main/archives/20150324/getusermedia.html
> [2] https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-main
> [3] http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#last-call
> [4]
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch-10#section-5.2
>
>