- From: Cullen Jennings (fluffy) <fluffy@cisco.com>
- Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 19:51:03 +0000
- To: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
- CC: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Bernard Aboba <Bernard.Aboba@microsoft.com>, Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>, Jan-Ivar Bruaroey <jib@mozilla.com>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
On Sep 3, 2014, at 4:20 PM, Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com> wrote: > The main argument against Promises in the past was churn to the existing API. There was also a strong argument for consistency and if we were going to use them, we should use them everywhere. I'm not arguing one way or the other, I'm just mentioning that this argument was pretty strongly made by EKR and others in the past.
Received on Thursday, 4 September 2014 19:51:31 UTC