- From: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 21:19:17 +0100
- To: "Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)" <matthew.kaufman@skype.net>
- Cc: "cowwoc" <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
> That's easy. You leave the bug open, because this issue is important > enough that the specification should not advance without at least formally > documenting this critical missing part. My perspective is that leaving the bug open is not necessary: normative references get assessed at transition requests (to Candidate Recommendation, Proposed Recommendation and Recommendation status) by the Director; should you find that a normative reference is fishy at the time the group resolves to move to one of these status, then would be the right time to oppose progress. Leaving the bug open is a detriment, since it creates noise on the list of things we need to do before we can declare we've done the work we've been assigned. My personal preference would thus to not open bugs on the status of normative references. Dom
Received on Thursday, 30 October 2014 20:19:30 UTC