- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 10:04:51 -0700
- To: Michael Tuexen <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de>
- Cc: Nicholas Wilson <nicholas@nicholaswilson.me.uk>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
On 27 March 2014 03:38, Michael Tuexen <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de> wrote: > No. You could continue to map the channel messages byte-by-byte > on SCTP messages. But you would introduce some control message > (also in SCTP DATA chunks) which you would send reliably and > put in whatever information is needed. For me this looks pretty simple... I think that this might be less than ideal. Unless you like buffering an entire BDP worth of data when the application starts applying back pressure.
Received on Thursday, 27 March 2014 17:05:19 UTC