W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > January 2014

Re: Summary of "What is missing for building real services" thread

From: Rob Manson <robman@mob-labs.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 11:19:48 +1100
Message-ID: <52D725A4.1010608@mob-labs.com>
CC: public-webrtc <public-webrtc@w3.org>
I definitely think there's a role for metadata tracks - and perhaps that 
relates more closely to VTT too (Silvia may like to comment on that).

But I think that's a separate discussion - happy to have it added to the 
list though.


On 16/01/14 11:06 AM, piranna@gmail.com wrote:
>> At the moment the only streams that can be used are the ones generated by
>> gUM. It would also be useful to be able to add post-processed streams (or
>> probably more accurately MediaStreamTracks e.g. use face tracking to mask a
>> persons face, or use object detection to highlight a specific object, etc.).
>> At the moment the only way to send this data to the remote client is via
>> another channel (e.g. DC or WS)...and sync'ing is definitely an issue there.
> Now that you say this: TextStreams and (uni-directional) DataStreams,
> for example on-wire video subtitles or metadata (identifiers,
> coordinates...) of the detected objects, so that info can be send
> synced to the other end. Theoretically, they should be just subclasses
> of MediaStreamTracks, and we have had already at my job problems
> trying to sync that info...
Received on Thursday, 16 January 2014 00:20:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:37 UTC