- From: <piranna@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 00:04:23 +0100
- To: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
- Cc: Tsahi Levent-Levi <tsahi.leventlevi@gmail.com>, public-webrtc <public-webrtc@w3.org>
> Even if PeerConnection did work in SharedWorkers, it wouldn't survive a > navigation, at least AFAICT: > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9336774/do-shared-web-workers-persist-across-a-single-page-reload-link-navigation > Persistent PeerConnection objects thanks to SharedWorkers is not an idea from mine, I'm interested on using them in ServiceWorkers that having a different API don't know if it would either, but anyway it was an interesting idea. After reading that link, I think if it wouldn't make sense to don't delete the SharedWorker if you are navigating to the same domain, regarding to the SharedWorker it should have the same behaviour having another window open or not... -- "Si quieres viajar alrededor del mundo y ser invitado a hablar en un monton de sitios diferentes, simplemente escribe un sistema operativo Unix." – Linus Tordvals, creador del sistema operativo Linux
Received on Wednesday, 15 January 2014 23:05:12 UTC