On 13 January 2014 06:13, Tim Panton new <thp@westhawk.co.uk> wrote: > Strikes me that a good short term default would be that https:// sites > default > to not supporting screenshot. http:// sites allow it, as do any that have > the > meta-screenshot tag set. That's somewhat attractive, but I'm not sure that that is a good idea. We haven't proven unequivocally that http: pages don't contain sensitive content. Sure, you can argue that there is nothing that an active attacker can't already get, but that's a little different to what we're getting here.Received on Monday, 13 January 2014 18:13:40 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:17:53 UTC