- From: Jan-Ivar Bruaroey <jib@mozilla.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 17:17:36 -0400
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>
- CC: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>, Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
On 4/30/14 4:27 PM, Martin Thomson wrote: > On 30 April 2014 13:22, Cullen Jennings (fluffy) <fluffy@cisco.com> wrote: >>> I might be missing something, but why do we need cloning? >> I assumed we would get rid of cloning once we added doohickeys. > Same. Hence the question. I think that it's less surprising if we > don't clone (outside of explicit calls to mst.clone()). Hang on, Martin, are you talking about implicit cloning? Any implicit cloning would be bad IMHO. I'm talking about the mst clone method. I didn't realize there was any other kind on the table. .: Jan-Ivar :.
Received on Wednesday, 30 April 2014 21:17:59 UTC