W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > April 2014

Re: Update of RTCRtpSender "doohickey" proposal

From: Jan-Ivar Bruaroey <jib@mozilla.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 17:17:36 -0400
Message-ID: <53616870.507@mozilla.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>
CC: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>, Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
On 4/30/14 4:27 PM, Martin Thomson wrote:
> On 30 April 2014 13:22, Cullen Jennings (fluffy) <fluffy@cisco.com> wrote:
>>> I might be missing something, but why do we need cloning?
>> I assumed we would get rid of cloning once we added doohickeys.
> Same.  Hence the question.  I think that it's less surprising if we
> don't clone (outside of explicit calls to mst.clone()).

Hang on, Martin, are you talking about implicit cloning? Any implicit 
cloning would be bad IMHO.

I'm talking about the mst clone method. I didn't realize there was any 
other kind on the table.

.: Jan-Ivar :.
Received on Wednesday, 30 April 2014 21:17:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:38 UTC