Re: Update of RTCRtpSender "doohickey" proposal from Martin Thomson on 2014-04-30 (public-webrtc@w3.org from April 2014)

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 13:27:21 -0700
To: "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>
Cc: Jan-Ivar Bruaroey <jib@mozilla.com>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>, Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
Message-ID: <CABkgnnVGqFUiUGW-MF-Uv9SRb-ORZEvdNu=MBaQNsxZDwxTwHQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 30 April 2014 13:22, Cullen Jennings (fluffy) <fluffy@cisco.com> wrote:
>> I might be missing something, but why do we need cloning?
>
> I assumed we would get rid of cloning once we added doohickeys.

Same.  Hence the question.  I think that it's less surprising if we
don't clone (outside of explicit calls to mst.clone()).

Received on Wednesday, 30 April 2014 20:27:48 UTC