W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > April 2014

Re: Update of RTCRtpSender "doohickey" proposal

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 16:07:47 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnUifpzHTpmP57yeHysEOW2KV5B4PK2-8FVAVwragnXo_w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jan-Ivar Bruaroey <jib@mozilla.com>
Cc: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
On 29 April 2014 15:56, Jan-Ivar Bruaroey <jib@mozilla.com> wrote:
> On 4/29/14 5:30 PM, Martin Thomson wrote:
>>
>> On 29 April 2014 14:08, Jan-Ivar Bruaroey <jib@mozilla.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Why allow both cloning of tracks and adding them to multiple
>>> PeerConnections?
>>
>> Oh, I missed this.  And I don't like it.  Cloning tracks seems
>> unnecessary.
>
>
> Well, you're posting in the wrong group for that. clone is in gUM.


I was talking about clone-on-RTCPeerConneciton::addStream
Received on Tuesday, 29 April 2014 23:08:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:38 UTC