W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > September 2013

Re: MTI Codec

From: Alexey Aylarov <alexey@zingaya.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 10:12:31 -0700
To: "Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)" <matthew.kaufman@skype.net>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CE589500.172A8%alexey@zingaya.com>
+1 , it's more related to browser in my opinion. Another question – are we
sure we want to have only one mandatory-to-implement video codec?

-Alexey

От:  "Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)" <matthew.kaufman@skype.net>
Дата:  Friday, September 13, 2013 10:02 AM
Кому:  "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Тема:  MTI Codec
Переслано адресатом:  <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Дата пересылки:  Fri, 13 Sep 2013 17:03:52 +0000

As I’m sure many of the people on this list are aware, the IETF RTCWEB
working group intends to make a decision regarding a mandatory-to-implement
video codec for WEBRTC.
 
It feels to me like mandating a codec (as it is part of the browser, not a
choice of on-the-wire format, already selected to be DTLS-SRTP) is really
the business of this W3C Working Group, not the IETF, just as the JavaScript
API is the business of this WG.
 
Thoughts?
 
Matthew Kaufman
 
Received on Friday, 13 September 2013 17:13:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:36 UTC