W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > November 2013

Re: ISSUE-3: Should we refactor the generic guidance on error handling out of the spec

From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 18:22:43 -0800
Message-ID: <CABcZeBN1Sh5B7mRKekE81P4TX1_gA+wBSJZRbxOi92D9bYLRtA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Cc: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>wrote:

> On 13 November 2013 18:18, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote:
> > I'm not sure if this was accidental or deliberate. We have decided
> > before to use buganizer, not this issue tracker. Does anyone wish to
> > pursue this?
>
> Strangely enough, after seeing what happens, I am liking the issue
> tracker quite a lot.


Oh, my bad. I will be happy to do whatever.



>  I think that EKR raised this one.


Yes.



> > (side note: If it moved out of the spec, where would it go?)
>
> I don't think that the intent was to move it out of the spec.  I
> believe that the point was to move the common logic to a single place
> to avoid the usual errors that arise from duplication and to improve
> the signal to noise ratio of the affected sections
>

Yes.

-Ekr
Received on Friday, 15 November 2013 02:23:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:36 UTC