Adam, when should we expect to see this show up in a new editor's draft? On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Adam Bergkvist <adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com > wrote: > Hi > > I've pushed a few changes just now. > > Github spec: > http://htmlpreview.github.com/**?https://github.com/fluffy/** > webrtc-w3c/blob/master/webrtc.**html<http://htmlpreview.github.com/?https://github.com/fluffy/webrtc-w3c/blob/master/webrtc.html> > > Last change: > https://github.com/fluffy/**webrtc-w3c/commit/** > 04e58a875d1926e03b6faf389f5d55**8f2d82136a<https://github.com/fluffy/webrtc-w3c/commit/04e58a875d1926e03b6faf389f5d558f2d82136a> > > > On 2013-03-11 15:39, Justin Uberti wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 5:10 AM, Adam Bergkvist >> <adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com <mailto:adam.bergkvist@**ericsson.com<adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com>>> >> wrote: >> >> What's the result of a fatal error? Close the PeerConnection? >> >> What should errorType be in this case, >> INCOMPATIBLE_SESSION___**DESCRIPTION? >> >> >> >> I think this would be the dreaded INTERNAL_ERROR; the PC is essentially >> in an undefined state at this point, and the application should discard >> it. The session description might have been fine, but we just exploded >> when trying to apply it. >> > > Ok. We need to specify how that would work. I guess this isn't the only > way to end up in such a state. Do you have any suggestions for this text? > > > We could also have a INCOMPATIBLE_SESSION_**DESCRIPTION error that >> indicates that there was some bad value in the SDP, but rollback was >> possible and the state has returned to the previous state. >> > > Ok. We just need to tweak the existing text a little to get this behaivor. > > > My point was that I didn't want to extend the description of the >> callback because it's the wrong place do document this kind of >> behavior. That was basically the motivation for the new text about >> how the ICE Agent talks to the script. >> >> >> OK - I'll wait for the updated version of the spec to see where you >> chose to document it. I don't really mind as long as it's in there >> somewhere. >> > > I've updated the text about how the ICE Agent notifies the script and > included the gathering state transition to "completed" as you suggested on > github. > > > I do think we need some >> way to specify when the gathering state transition to >> "completed" occurs. >> > > /Adam >Received on Monday, 18 March 2013 19:08:20 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:17:42 UTC