W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > March 2013

Re: WebRTC spec errata (regarding states)

From: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 12:07:32 -0700
Message-ID: <CAOJ7v-1rzTHP4X5B7qM9G+ZfrkZMpgDc0EhoPxjtU9rfQVDNTg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Adam Bergkvist <adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com>
Cc: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>, Per Kjellander <perkj@google.com>, Mallinath Bareddy <mallinath@google.com>, Harald Alvestrand <hta@google.com>
Adam, when should we expect to see this show up in a new editor's draft?


On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Adam Bergkvist <adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com
> wrote:

> Hi
>
> I've pushed a few changes just now.
>
> Github spec:
> http://htmlpreview.github.com/**?https://github.com/fluffy/**
> webrtc-w3c/blob/master/webrtc.**html<http://htmlpreview.github.com/?https://github.com/fluffy/webrtc-w3c/blob/master/webrtc.html>
>
> Last change:
> https://github.com/fluffy/**webrtc-w3c/commit/**
> 04e58a875d1926e03b6faf389f5d55**8f2d82136a<https://github.com/fluffy/webrtc-w3c/commit/04e58a875d1926e03b6faf389f5d558f2d82136a>
>
>
> On 2013-03-11 15:39, Justin Uberti wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 5:10 AM, Adam Bergkvist
>> <adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com <mailto:adam.bergkvist@**ericsson.com<adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com>>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>     What's the result of a fatal error? Close the PeerConnection?
>>
>>     What should errorType be in this case,
>>     INCOMPATIBLE_SESSION___**DESCRIPTION?
>>
>>
>>
>> I think this would be the dreaded INTERNAL_ERROR; the PC is essentially
>> in an undefined state at this point, and the application should discard
>> it. The session description might have been fine, but we just exploded
>> when trying to apply it.
>>
>
> Ok. We need to specify how that would work. I guess this isn't the only
> way to end up in such a state. Do you have any suggestions for this text?
>
>
>  We could also have a INCOMPATIBLE_SESSION_**DESCRIPTION error that
>> indicates that there was some bad value in the SDP, but rollback was
>> possible and the state has returned to the previous state.
>>
>
> Ok. We just need to tweak the existing text a little to get this behaivor.
>
>
>      My point was that I didn't want to extend the description of the
>>     callback because it's the wrong place do document this kind of
>>     behavior. That was basically the motivation for the new text about
>>     how the ICE Agent talks to the script.
>>
>>
>> OK - I'll wait for the updated version of the spec to see where you
>> chose to document it. I don't really mind as long as it's in there
>> somewhere.
>>
>
> I've updated the text about how the ICE Agent notifies the script and
> included the gathering state transition to "completed" as you suggested on
> github.
>
>
>          I do think we need some
>>         way to specify when the gathering state transition to
>>         "completed" occurs.
>>
>
> /Adam
>
Received on Monday, 18 March 2013 19:08:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:32 UTC