- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 14:13:31 -0700
- To: cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>
- Cc: "Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)" <matthew.kaufman@skype.net>, "piranna@gmail.com" <piranna@gmail.com>, Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
On 20 June 2013 10:37, cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org> wrote: > We need an API that lies somewhere between WebRTC and CU-RTCWEB because > it looks like the latter complicates common use-cases. If you disagree, can > you please reply with a complete testcase demonstrating what a common > use-case would look like? The CU-RTC-Web code samples show that it's very easy to establish a simple audio call. Complexity of the simplest scenarios are on-par with RTCPeerConnection. A more complicated example is shown here: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webrtc/2012Oct/0076.html (look at the second example, not the first)
Received on Thursday, 20 June 2013 21:13:59 UTC