W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > June 2013

Re: Conclusion of RTCIceServer multiple-URI thread

From: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 16:31:18 -0700
Message-ID: <CAOJ7v-24OVUFw15sz+tsgi_GcpqwYv=SuKYShXccSaVSjX6y8A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Adam Bergkvist <adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com>
Cc: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
I prefer |urls| as well. We can continue to support |url| for the time
being for backwards compatibility.


On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:36 PM, Adam Bergkvist <
adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com> wrote:

> We won't break anything by changing the input argument name and I think
> urls is better since it hints that it accepts more that one (compare with
> WebSocket's protocols argument).
>
> /Adam
>
>
> On 2013-06-13 19:00, Justin Uberti wrote:
>
>> Previously, the syntax was |url|, so if we want to keep the union, we
>> should use |url| instead of |urls|. I'm fine either way.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 2:17 AM, Adam Bergkvist
>> <adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com <mailto:adam.bergkvist@**ericsson.com<adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com>>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>     On 2013-06-13 09:43, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
>>
>>         I added this to the bug tracker. Adam, could you pick it up?
>>
>>
>>     Yes.
>>
>>     We can use a union here to support the old syntax (or simpler syntax
>>     without needing the [] around a single url).
>>
>>     dictionary RTCIceServer {
>>          (DOMString or sequence<DOMString>)  urls;
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
Received on Saturday, 15 June 2013 23:32:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:33 UTC