- From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 12:38:43 -0600
- To: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <50FEDCB3.1080402@nostrum.com>
In discussing our implementation of STUN and TURN URIs, it became
apparent that there is a mismatch between what is currently proposed in
the IETF and what is given as an example in the most recent W3C WebRTC
editor's draft (as well as assumptions around what parameters are needed
for defining an ICE server configuration record).
>From
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-petithuguenin-behave-turn-uri-03#appendix-A.4
<username> is not used in the URIs because it is not used to guide
the resolution mechanism.
>From http://dev.w3.org/2011/webrtc/editor/webrtc.html#rtcconfiguration-type
> An example array of RTCIceServer objects is:
>
> |[ { url:"stun:stun.example.net" } , {
> url:"turn:user@turn.example.org", credential:"myPassword"} ]|
>
These need to be harmonized. I suspect we really need to define
RTCIceServer to contain an optional "user" parameter of type DOMString,
and give the example as:
[ { url:"stun:stun.example.net" } , { url:"turn:turn.example.org",
user:"myUsername", credential:"myPassword"} ]
/a
Received on Tuesday, 22 January 2013 18:39:07 UTC