W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > January 2013

Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Agenda for Interim

From: Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2013 11:27:57 +0100
Message-ID: <50EBF4AD.2000006@ericsson.com>
To: rtcweb@ietf.org, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
(Sorry for cross-posting).

On 2013-01-02 16:12, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> Chairs,
>
> I've spent some time thinking about the agenda for the interim, and
> thought it might be helpful if I sent you a strawman based on the
> items that are blocking progress in terms of implementation and
> interoperability.
>
> Note:
> I am assuming 4 hours each day. The times have been selected with
> the objective of giving us enough time to really resolve the
> open issues. Honestly, we might even add more time for
> the issues on day 1.
>
> Hope this is helpful.

One thing that I think we should discuss when there are protocol _and_ 
API people in the same room is call flows. We touched on it in the Lyon 
W3C meeting, but it was apparent that not everyone had the same view.

Perhaps this could be folded into the "accept/reject" discussion 
proposed in [1].

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webrtc/2013Jan/0000.html


>
> Day 1
> 2:00    Bundle   [Holmberg]
> Objective: select an approach and work out enough
> details that the editors can work to produce a
> suitable draft.
>
> Drafts:
> - http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-bundle-negotiation
> - http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-alvestrand-one-rtp
> - http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-holmberg-mmusic-sdp-mmt-negotiation
>
>
> 2:00    Multiple flow SDP representation [Jennings, Alvestrand]
> Objective: decide on an architecture for large numbers
> of similar streams (e.g., multiple video streams).
>
> Drafts:
> - http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-alvestrand-rtcweb-msid
> - http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-alvestrand-mmusic-msid
> - Do we have a "master" document for the single m-line case?
> - Multiple m-lines doesn't have a document
>
>
> Day 2
> 1:30    Mapping stream/track label concepts SDP identifiers [Alvestrand]
> Objective: determine requirements
> 1:30    Trickle ICE open issues [Ivov(?), Uberti, Rescorla]
> - Starting checks
> - Termination conditions
> - Error handling
> Drafts:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rescorla-mmusic-ice-trickle
>
> 1:00    SDP for Datachannels open issues [Jesup, Loreto]
> Objective: resolve open issues (post WGLC?)
>
> Drafts:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mmusic-sctp-sdp-02
>
> Day 3
> 1:00    Other recommended audio codecs [Roach]
> Objective: identify what other audio codecs we intend to
> recommend.
>
> 1:00    Process WGLC comments on documents [authors]
>
> 0:30    Other business
>
> 0:30    Wrapup/next steps [Chairs]
>
>
> Best,
> -Ekr
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>
Received on Tuesday, 8 January 2013 10:28:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:32 UTC