Re: Minor document refactoring (split PeerConnection idl)

It looks more clear and easier to understand and develop
implementations in a modular way to me, +1.


2013/2/13 Adam Bergkvist <adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com>:
> Hi
>
> The current spec is organized so that there's a main PeerConnection section
> and several sub sections that specifies additional features (like the
> Peer-to-peer Data API, Stats API and so on). Right now the main
> PeerConnection idl contains all the extensions these features introduce (~10
> methods/attributes).
>
> The enclosed spec is an example of how this could be split up so that
> feature sections have their own partial PeerConnection interface with the
> methods and atttributes they add to the main interface. The result is more
> self-contained feature sections and a slimmer PeerConnection main interface.
>
> This is currently done in a separate branch. If people think this is good
> we'll merge it into the main branch.
>
> /Adam (for the editors)



-- 
"Si quieres viajar alrededor del mundo y ser invitado a hablar en un
monton de sitios diferentes, simplemente escribe un sistema operativo
Unix."
– Linus Tordvals, creador del sistema operativo Linux