W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > December 2013

Re: Material for discussing scoping for version one

From: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 11:14:04 -0800
Message-ID: <CAOJ7v-0u8+JizvsLFVbPhxoCw7fsyZCbQ7vO9vh-hO+KxaQP+w@mail.gmail.com>
To: tim panton <thp@westhawk.co.uk>
Cc: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, Stefan HÃ¥kansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Talking to people at shows, I get the impression that most folks just want
us to stabilize what exists and ship it.

Some people of course would like to have cutting edge stuff like layered
coding, but they realize that this stuff is significant work and are
willing to wait for a dot release.



On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 10:09 AM, tim panton <thp@westhawk.co.uk> wrote:

>
> On 17 Dec 2013, at 16:06, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 2:16 AM, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
> wrote:
> >> On 12/16/2013 08:36 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> >
> >>> Hmm... I feel like this is a little fixated on timeline. I would rather
> >>> ask what's needed to have something that's viable.
> >>
> >>
> >> It seems that people think what's implemented now is "viable" for a lot
> of
> >> applications (even thouhgh many find it painful to use).
> >
> > That's not the impression I receive talking to people at shows. Rather,
> > they think it's demoable and urgently needs a bunch of stuff.
> >
> >
>
> The thing it needs most urgently is support from the other 2 browsers.
> Prompt standardisation would help there I feel.
>
> T.
>
Received on Tuesday, 17 December 2013 19:14:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:37 UTC